UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TAMPA DIVISION

 

MILO A. ROSE,
            PETITIONER

v.                                                          CASE No. 8:93-CV-1169-T-23EAJ

JAMES V. CROSBY JR.,
            RESPONDENT

PETITIONER’S PRO SE REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
INQUIRY/INTERROGATORY EXPANSION OF RECORD

Now comes Petitioner humbly before this Court seeking leave Pro Se to request expansion of record through interrogatory judicial inquiry of attorneys: Bruce Young, Bruce Bartlett, Ron Edie, Wayne Shipp and Darryl Rouson.  In regards to the irreparable prejudice created through the failure of the State to turn over wealth of exculpatory/impeachment evidence on demand for discovery and preventing Petitioner from receiving a fair and impartial trial.

The record does reflect Pro Se petitioner has filed repeated complaints to both this Court and State Court in regards to the neglect of Court appointed registry attorney Bjorn Brunvand to honor his request to seek depositions from the five forementioned attorneys.      

On December 12, 2005, while attending evidentiary hearing before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins in pursuant to Faretta v. California and rendering of report and recommendation to this Court. Pro Se Petitioner made personal request of attorney Brunvand to fill in the addresses upon form letter and on stamped envelopes with enclosed material to mail to the five forementioned attorneys. Attorney Brunvand said he would do that.  (Attachment A, copy of form letter and receipt for copies of all material sent to forementioned attorneys).

To personal knowledge of Petitioner none of the five forementioned attorneys honoured his request for Amicus Curiae briefs in support of his pleadings before this Court.  Nor has attorney Brunvand addressed deposing said attorneys.

Pro Se Petitioner admits to only being a layman to the law and as such remains at the mercy of this Court to uphold the (INTEGRITY) of the law through the use of Judicial discretion to conduct interrogatory inquiries of the five forementioned attorneys by ordering them to respond Amicus Curiae to: PETITIONER’S SUPPORT BRIEF ADDRESSING FARETTA STANDARD WHILE AMENDING AND INCORPORATING ALL EXISTING HABENS ISSUES PENDING BEFORE THIS COURT.  Filed before this Court December 2, 2005.

Pro Se Petitioner believes the record clearly speaks for itself as to the irreparable prejudice created due to the failure by the State to turn over wealth and exculpatory/impeachment evidence upon demand for discovery and that none of the forementioned attorneys when faced with said wealth of favorable information will be able to condone the actions or practice of thus having to admit Petitioner was denied a fair and impartial trial under their watch……

Petitioner now lists full name address and phone numbers of the five attorneys he prays this Court orders to respond.

Bruce R. Young
Slater and Young, P.A.
36402 U.S. Hwy. 19N
Palm Harbor, Florida 34684-1330
Phone Nos. (727) 787-7773 – (727) 372-0677
Fax: (727) 787-7668

Bruce L. Bartlett
State Attorneys Office
6th Judicial Circuit
Room B-200
5100 144th Ave N
Clearwater, Florida 34620-2803
Phone No. (727) 530-6516
Fax: (727) 464-6427
Wayne Shipp
Law Office of Shipp & Deeb, P.A.
6675 Thirteenth Avenue North
Suite 2C
St Petersburg, Florida 33710
Phone No. (727) 381-33710
Fax: (727) 381-1155

Darryl E. Rouson. P.A.
3110 First Avenue
N. Suite 5W
Saint Petersburg
Florida 33713

IN CONCLUSION

 

Petitioner swears under penalty of perjury that everything contained within this Petition is true and supported by the record.  Petitioner therefore prays this Court accept his pleadings and order interrogatory Amicas Curiae briefs.  Petitioner begs this Court to render in overturning his conviction and sentence.

                                                Submitted by Pro Se Petitioner

                                                ___________________________
                                                Milo Rose #090411
                                                Union Correctional Institution
                                                7819 NW 228th Street P61235
                                                Raiford, Florida 32026-4460
                       
                                                GOOGLE – MILO ROSE

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

                        I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

Petition has been furnished by U.S. Mail, first class delivery this

26 day of May, 2006, to:  Assist. Attorney General Carol Dittmar,

Concourse Center #4, 3507 Frontage Road, Suite 200, Tampa,

Florida 33607, Assist. St. Attorney C. Marie King, Office of State

Attorney, P.O. Box 5028, Clearwater, Florida 34618 and Bjorn

Brunvand Esq, 615 Turner Street, Clearwater, Florida 33756-5314.

 

 

                                                                        MILO A. ROSE #090411
                                                                                               
                                                                                                _______________________
                                                                                                Union Correctional Institution
                                                                                                7819 NW 228th Street P61235
                                                                                                Raiford, Florida 32026-446 
                                                           
                                                           

 

 

MILO ROSE #090411
UNION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
7819 NW. 228TH STREET
RAIFORD
FLORIDA 32026-4450

December 12, 2005

 

Dear

Please find enclosed a copy of Judge Steven D. Merryday’s November 8, 2005, Order, Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins, Order dated November 18, 2005, and my Pro Se response filed December 2, 2005.

As you will notice you are mentioned within my petition.  My initial plan was to subpoena you, and the others mentioned within my Petition.  In order to depose you as to the irreparable prejudice created by withheld favorable evidence that prevent me from receiving a fair and impartial trial.  But, have since decided to give you the opportunity to file Amicus Curiae in response to my Pro Se pleadings in lieu of being subpoenaed.  If I do not hear from you by January 6, 2006 I will submit my petition to subpoena you for deposition.

Respectfully